Featured Advertisers
Thu, Sep. 09  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS | ALERTS |
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.



Visit Kelly Hannon's blog: On the Road

-

View More Images from this story

Visit the Photo Place

VRE to shuffle board?

Stafford, Fredericksburg could each pick up seat on VRE Operations Board

Date published: 12/6/2006

By KELLY HANNON

Stafford and Fredericksburg could get a larger say in Virginia Railway Express operations.

A VRE committee has proposed new membership for the VRE Operations Board.

Voting would become proportionate to ridership, and so would the cost of belonging to VRE. Since ridership is growing south and west of Northern Virginia, this could mean a shift in power, and bearing of expenses of commuter rail, from Washington's inner suburbs to outer suburbs.

"It's a big change," VRE CEO Dale Zehner said.

"What we're doing is looking at ourselves and saying, 'Are we going to expand? Are we going to expand south and west?' I think if we want to do that, we have to change our agreement and open it up a little bit," he said yesterday in an interview.

Today, Stafford and Fredericksburg share a single representative on the seven-member VRE Operations Board. Yet 20 percent of VRE's passengers live in Stafford and Fredericksburg. Another 11.2 percent of riders from Spotsylvania board the trains at Stafford and Fredericksburg stations.

Subsidies are a little unbalanced, too. VRE calculates each locality's subsidy based on a formula of 90 percent ridership and 10 percent population.

Twenty percent of VRE riders live in Fairfax, but because the county has a total population of more than 1 million people, it pays an annual subsidy of nearly $4 million. By comparison, Stafford, with 16.7 percent of ridership and a population of about 117,000, is paying $917,147.

The proposal would phase out the population component. Stafford's subsidy would rise to $1,293,752 over four years. Fredericksburg would go from paying $111,115 to $174,099.

VRE member localities levy a 2 percent gas tax at the pumps to pay for this subsidy. Stafford and Fredericksburg earned enough from gas taxes between July 2005 and June 2006--the most recent fiscal year--to accommodate a higher subsidy.


1  2  3  Next Page  


Date published: 12/6/2006



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 2 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

2% Gas Tax errr...surcharge. (posted by wsloftus , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
What I find interesting is that last year Stafford took in over $376,000 more from the gas surcharge than it paid out to VRE. Where is that money going now?

VRE Analogy (posted by therestofthestory , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
Maybe here is an analogy that Mr. Zehner of VRE can understand...Would he hire an employee that said to him at their interview that they would be late at least one day a week and in the summer maybe two days a week. That is exacly the type of on time performance VRE has. You either don't hire the employee or you fire them! In VRE's case Spotsylvania is very wise not to hire junp on a failing system.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.