Daniel Rogan, 12, holds a photo of his first kitten, 9-month-old Snowball, who suffered kidney failure and was euthanized two weeks ago after eating tainted pet food. DAVID GOLDMAN/BOSTON HERALD/ASSOCIATED PRESS Visit the Photo Place

Pet-food scandal

Date published: 4/8/2007

NORFOLK--When dogs and cats began to sicken and die after eating certain brands of commercial food, the public had the right to expect swift action from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to resolve the situation. That's not what we got. Instead, FDA officials have dithered, hemmed and hawed, and appear more interested in protecting manufacturers' reputations than in preventing more suffering and death.

Given the scope and tragedy of the FDA's failure to act, Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach should step down and allow a more capable leader to direct the agency.

The flaws in the agency's response became apparent soon after Menu Foods announced on March 16 that some of its products had led to kidney failure and death in dogs and cats. Rather than calling for an immediate recall of all brands that may have been contaminated, the FDA turned over all recall decisions to the manufacturers and referred the public to Menu Foods' Web site for a list of contaminated foods rather than providing the information itself, as would be expected of a public agency. At a March 26 news conference, an agency official tellingly referred to the pet-food manufacturers as his "colleagues at Menu Foods."

In the weeks since, the agency has failed to identify the contaminant with any certainty. Menu Foods first announced that aminopterin, a chemical used to poison rats, was found in canned foods. But it wasn't long before the FDA identified wheat gluten contaminated with melamine, a chemical used in making plastics, as the culprit. We still don't know for certain, and two independent laboratories are now claiming that the FDA was wrong--melamine is not the contaminant.

The FDA is so far sticking to the melamine theory but has inexplicably refused to name a dry-pet-food manufacturer believed to have received the suspected contaminated ingredient, and hasn't recalled brands of dry food that may be affected. When asked about this at the March 26 news conference, Dr. Stephen Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine, excused the agency's lack of action by saying, "This is an ongoing investigation."

Follow us on

Date published: 4/8/2007