a publication of Customer Care  FredTalk Discussion Forum Fredericksburg.com Search the Star Directory for Local Businesses in the Fredericksburg Virginia Area
Fri, Jan. 09, 2009 | make us your homepage
ADVERTISE - Alerts - Mobile - Closings - Contact
    YOUR COMMUNITY:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland

advertisement

advertisement

 

 


 
Forget nuclear, try 'concentrating solar power'

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

Date published: 5/5/2007

Forget nuclear, try 'concentrating solar power'

This is regarding the article titled "Dominion Power's North Anna plant reviewed by NRC" [April 17].

There is no need for nuclear power in the U.S. because there is a simple mature technology that can deliver huge amounts of clean energy without any of the headaches of nuclear power.

I refer to "concentrating solar power," or CSP, the simple but effective technique of concentrating sunlight using mirrors to create heat, and then using the heat to raise steam and drive turbines and generators, just like a conventional power station.

It is possible to store solar heat in melted salts so that electricity generation may continue at night or on cloudy days. This technology has been generating electricity successfully in California since 1985. CSP plants are now being planned or built in many parts of the world.

CSP works best in hot deserts and, of course, these are not nearby. But it is feasible and economical to transmit solar electricity over very long distances using highly efficient, high-voltage, direct-current transmission lines.

With transmission losses at about 3 percent per 1,000 km, solar electricity may be transmitted to most of the U.S. and much of Canada.

In a report commissioned by the German government, it is estimated that CSP electricity, imported from North Africa and the Middle East, could become one of the cheapest sources of electricity in Europe, including the cost of transmission.

Gerry Wolff Anglesey, England


Date published: 5/5/2007


Most recent reader comments:

1 comment has been posted. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Supporting Link (posted by MacD , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
Go to this link http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/04/AR2007050402466.html?hpid=topnews and find an interesting artilce in support of Mr. Anglesey's letter.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
(Posts that exceed the 512-character limit will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.