Sometimes a debate that doesn't happen can reveal more about candidates than one that actually takes place ["Stafford forum far from a debate," Aug. 24].
The Stafford forum included prearranged questions. The organizers insisted on a format that required candidates to respond to most questions with simplistic yes-no answers and did not allow for explanations of those answers.
How did the candidates react to such a ridiculous situation?
The Republican candidates--Tom Coen and Cord Sterling--simply followed instructions and dutifully showed up, with Supervisor Jack Cavalier noting that he didn't want to be "disrespectful" of the sponsors
In contrast, the Democratic candidates--Bob Woodson, Jerry Kirven, and Harry Crisp--stood up, refused to play by these outrageous developer rules, and rejected the invitation to attend.
In both cases, their actions spoke louder than words.
Like many voters, I've been frustrated by seeing candidates say they will fight runaway growth, traffic congestion, and higher taxes, only to later vote for developer-sponsored legislation (like the TND) that does just the opposite.
In this Democratic slate, we seem to have some candidates who are willing to stand up to special interests and finally show some respect for residents, rather than for developers. It's about time.
Clay Young Stafford