Featured Advertisers
Tue, Dec. 01  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

Mike White, father of Virginia Tech shooting victim Nicole White, wears a photo of his daughter.

View More Images from this story

Visit the Photo Place

View the Stafford County community page

tech tragedy gives urgency to efforts, he says kaine backing gun checks

Kaine wants tighter control of guns

Date published: 1/9/2008

By Chelyen Davis

RICHMOND-- Flanked by families of the Virginia Tech shooting victims, Gov. Tim Kaine said yesterday that that tragedy has given urgency to requiring background checks on gun purchases, even from private dealers.

Kaine was announcing his support for closing the "gun-show loophole"--a part of the law that exempts from background checks gun purchases made through private, unlicensed sellers.

"Closing this loophole does not place an unreasonable burden on buyers or sellers," Kaine said.

"There's no reason for law-abiding gun owners to oppose the background check Now, more than ever in the aftermath of April 16, Virginia understands this is a public-safety issue. We need to close this last door which would enable criminals and others to find easy access to guns."

State law requires licensed dealers to run a background check on everyone buying a gun; felons, those under a restraining order, or those a judge has said are mentally ill and a danger to themselves or others, are not supposed to be able to buy guns.

But a private citizen can go to a gun show and sell a gun to anyone, without running a background check. To fall into that category, the seller can only sell a certain number of guns a year.

While Seung Hui-Cho, the student who killed 32 Tech students and faculty, and injured others, did not buy his guns at a gun show, he could have--and, said one parent, would have if his mental health background had turned up on a background check, preventing him from legally buying guns.

"That's what Mr. Cho would have done," said Joe Samaha, a Stafford County Realtor whose daughter Reema was killed in the shootings. "I plead to the delegates and senators this session to pass this law, that will close the loophole for the benefit of all Virginians."

Efforts to close the loophole in years past have been unsuccessful, in part because of opposition from gun rights groups who think it infringes on their rights.

Kaine acknowledged that the legislation has been "a challenging bill in the past." But, he said, if requiring private sellers at gun shows to do background checks would save even one life, it is worth it, and that the Tech shootings prove it isn't just a theoretical argument.


1  2  Next Page  


Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 1/9/2008


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 6 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Why wouldn't you... (posted by Faithful_Reader , Jan. 10, 2008 4:08 pm)   
While were at it, let's drug test everyone that lives or works in Virginia. After all, "Why wouldn't you want to prevent a crime?''

Good Idea it would not have helped.. (posted by sls001 , Jan. 9, 2008 12:23 pm)   
While I think this is a good idea - it would not have helped in the VT case because if you look back the agency that was supposed to report his metal illness did not report it so when he purchased the guns his back-ground check came back with no issues!

Get real! (posted by Chiswald , Jan. 9, 2008 10:27 am)   
This bill isn't going to outlaw guns for law abiding citizens. The intent is simply to make it a little more difficult for those with a criminal or mentally deranged history to purchase them. Comparing the sale of alcohol with the sale of guns is juvenile.

Patrick... (posted by freedomfirst , Jan. 9, 2008 10:19 am)   
I finally agree with you on a gun issue. Even though you characterize me as an NRA stormtrooper, I firmly believe the constitution is the law of the land. That includes protecting the people from criminals and the insane. To me, this isn't a gun issue at all. Daniel, you are in left field on this. If you want to control alcohol consumption handle it the way States handle cigarette consumption. Charge a $50.00 a bottle tax. It's not going to happen since most of our lawmakers are tipplers.

How about this to cut down on deaths (posted by DanielMMahon , Jan. 9, 2008 8:09 am)   
The state sells booze at the state owned liquor stores. How about we outlaw booze. Or how about background checks for all the drinkers. Alcohol kills! Seems to me the state has a double standard here. They actually are part of the process of selling alcohol that people drink too much and cause alcohol related issues here in Virginia.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.