|
|
|
| Mon, Nov. 30 - - Mobile - RSS | |
|
|
BILL MAKES DRIVING MISS FIDO ILLEGAL
Delegate doesn't want your dog in your lap in the carDate published: 1/16/2008 RICHMOND--Most of us have, on some occasion, looked over at the car next to us and seen a dog in the driver's lap, tail wagging or head hanging out of the window happily. When Del. Bobby Mathieson spots that, he sees a safety hazard. Mathieson, a freshman Democratic delegate from Virginia Beach, has introduced a bill to bar drivers from driving with an animal in their lap, or allowing an animal in the car to block their view. Mathieson, a retired police officer, said he has heard anecdotal evidence of dogs in laps being such a distraction to the driver that they've caused accidents, although he never worked such an accident during his career. "It's an absolute driver distraction," Mathieson said. "Just like a cell phone." Mathieson said there aren't any statistics on accidents caused by drivers being distracted by dogs, and there isn't a box on police accident reports to specify that a dog on the driver's lap caused the accident. Some have said animal distractions would fall under reckless driving, if an accident resulted, but Mathieson said he thinks it needs to be specifically spelled out in the code. His bill doesn't outline how a driver would keep a dog off his or her lap while driving, and it doesn't require that animals in cars be restrained in any way. Mathieson said, however, that his bill would help protect the animals as well as the drivers. "It's animal friendly because it keeps the dog safe and the cat safe," he said. Mathieson's bill has been sent to the House Transportation Committee, and has not been heard there yet. Driving with a pet in your lap is a distraction, said Debra Joseph, executive director of the Greater Fredericksburg Area SPCA. "I kind of equate it to talking on a cell phone or putting on makeup. You' re not paying full attention," Joseph said. Dogs and cats who are normally calm in a vehicle can react to outside objects, Joseph said, creating a safety hazard. "Certain animals will react to either noises or they're looking out the window and they see another dog or squirrel," she said. "We occasionally hear stories like that, so again, that certainly can be a safety factor."
Date published: 1/16/2008
Um wow we pay these guys?
(posted by
Clodius
, Jan. 17, 2008 9:24 am)
Wow this delegate should be fired for wasting our time. Got nothing better to do then think about some dumb bill. There are at least a few thousand other ideas for bills better then this one. This guy should be fired on the spot for wasting everybody's time..
There is already a law....
(posted by
kowalskiOA5599
, Jan. 17, 2008 5:58 am)
against driving with pets in your lap. It's called reckless driving and it can be applied anytime that the police deem it necessary.
There should be....
(posted by
kowalskiOA5599
, Jan. 17, 2008 5:53 am)
a law against stupid delegates. State lawmakers can't seem to tackle the tough issues. They should all resign and go home. Then we would have enough money to fix Virginia's roads & highways.
Re:
(posted by
Aidia
, Jan. 16, 2008 11:45 pm)
My dog rides in my lap all the time while I drive, and is never a distraction. He's a small dog and lies there sleeping across where my seatbelt is. You can't outlaw every distraction that a driver might have. What's next? outlawing infants from cars because mothers look in mirrors at them? What about kids? they distract parents.. radios... they are distracting! If someone's accident involves their inability to focus on driving then charge them with an already available law such as reckless driving...
drive
(posted by
suzuki4wheeler
, Jan. 16, 2008 4:24 pm)
I think everyone just needs to learn how to drive.90 percent of this country does not know how to drive.Very sad because it effects people like me who can drive a nascar while on my call phone, my dog on my lap and be drinking a soda.comeon people get with it.
|
 |
|||
|
|||
