Featured Advertisers
Sun, Nov. 08  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.


Visit Emily Battle's blog: City Beat

The Fredericksburg Expo and Conference Center may be sold to Kalahari.

Visit the Photo Place

Related Stories

MUSIC ACTS COMING BACK (10/22/2009)
Celebrate Virginia Live concerts to return

KYBECCA MISSES DEADLINE (8/6/2009)
Not much to know about incentivized projects yet

Boy, 3, drowns at Kalahari water park in Ohio (8/4/2009)
Boy drowns at Kalahari's Sandusky resort

Kalahari eyes Expo Center

Kalahari to buy Expo Center


Date published: 3/21/2008

BY EMILY BATTLE

Kalahari Resorts plans to eventually buy the Fredericksburg Expo and Convention Center and operate it as part of the water-park hotel and conference center it plans to build in Celebrate Virginia, according to Jud Honaker, the Silver Cos. president of commercial development.

For that reason, Kalahari has asked that the 18.8-acre Expo Center property be included in the tax increment financing, or TIF, district the city proposes to create to distribute incentives to the resort operator.

The addition of the Expo land to the Kalahari TIF district became public Tuesday, when a legal ad in The Free Lance-Star and a map released at a City Council work session both indicated these boundaries for the district.

City officials say this is because Kalahari asked for this land to be included in the TIF district last week. City Council members were briefed on this development in a closed session last Tuesday.

City Economic Development Director Kevin Gullette said this new development does not change the basic nature of the Kalahari incentives package.

But it has raised questions among some council members, particularly because as recently as January, council members were publicly debating whether the city should grant the Expo Center $225,000 a year for three years to help it enhance its operations.

Councilman Marvin Dixon said he never supported the Expo subsidy, and "Once you tie Expo to Kalahari it complicates the policy discussion."

Gullette emphasized that the inclusion of the Expo property in the Kalahari TIF district was not a way to revive the Expo grant, which was tabled in January.

"In no way is the city backing into an incentive package for the Expo Center through the TIF district," Gullette said yesterday. "Everything we are doing is for Kalahari Resorts."

KALAHARI PLANNED TO WORK WITH EXPO

Honaker said the idea of Kalahari and the Expo Center being connected in some fashion has been part of talks about the project from day one.


1  2  3  Next Page  

TIF stands for "tax increment financing." That is a mechanism governments can use to pledge the future revenues from a tax base that is expected to increase to pay for a public project.

City Attorney Kathleen Dooley has defined the public project in this case as, "the commitment by the Fredericksburg Economic Development Authority to pay Kalahari a performance grant, in return for it selecting Fredericksburg for the location of its new Virginia resort."

To do this, the city will have to adopt an ordinance that sets boundaries on a specific "TIF district" for this project. That ordinance will dictate that all new revenues that the land, buildings and businesses on that district generate after Kalahari opens for businesses will go into a designated Kalahari TIF fund.

Of that money, 47.5 percent will go to the EDA, which will give it to Kalahari as its incentive grant. The rest will revert to the city's general fund.

All of the revenue that the land is generating now will not be subject to the 47.5 percent rebate.

Jud Honaker, president of commercial development for the Silver Cos., took issue yesterday with mayoral candidate and Councilwoman Debby Girvan's claims that Fredericksburg "can't afford" the incentives package it is offering to Kalahari Resorts.

"One of the candidates in this year's race keeps saying over and over again that the city can't afford this deal," Honaker said. "The city can't afford not to do this. This is all new revenue the city needs."

Honaker then added, "A vote against Kalahari is a vote for future tax increases."

Girvan has said publicly that the Kalahari incentives package, under which the city would return to the resort 47.5 percent of the new tax revenue it generates over 20 years and waive several development fees, is out of proportion to what the city will get from the more than $225 million project.

"I'd ask him if he would approve this if he were on council," Girvan said. "I think he would have driven a harder deal than this."

Honaker said the new revenue that Kalahari is projected to generate--which would be just over $3 million a year, based on the resort's estimated tax payments, after the incentives are paid out--is crucial to funding city services in the future.

Proponents of the Kalahari project on the council have pointed to flagging sales tax numbers as a sign that the city needs a strong tourist attraction to broaden its tax base, and to keep homeowners from having to shoulder the soaring costs of local government through the real estate tax.

But Girvan said she doesn't think all of the potential costs the project could add to city operations have been exposed.

She acknowledged that many of the costs she brought up--a third fire station and improvements to Fall Hill Avenue among them--would be necessary regardless of whether Kalahari comes to town, but said she thinks the city has "settled for" the deal it's struck with Kalahari, and that it has compromised too much.

Mayor Tom Tomzak, Girvan's opponent in the May 6 mayoral election, said the costs to the city have been studied and presented publicly, and "there is a very positive balance."

He agreed with Honaker.

"If we don't have tourism as our economic engine, we are going to have to look at other options," he said. "That is a distressing thought."

--Emily Battle

The City Council will hold a public hearing on the proposed TIF district, as well as the performance agreement that will govern the Kalahari incentives, on April 8 at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall.

THE KALAHARI INCENTIVE DEBATE

THE ISSUE: The addition of the Fredericksburg Expo and Convention Center's property to the special tax district for the Kalahari incentives is causing some confusion. THE RESPONSE: The city and Silver Cos. both say this is not a way to give incentives to the Expo Center, which Kalahari will take over. The Silvers are working on a possible solution that could remove the Expo property from the district.


Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Read more stories about Fredericksburg
Date published: 3/21/2008


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 12 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Kalahari, UMW, it's always someone taking over (posted by thatguyb , Mar. 21, 2008 9:05 pm)   
I think a few years back I heard someone say UMW was trying to take over the city, now someone's stating Kalahari is going to take over? I say lets put them head to head and see who wins. The winner gets to build the new courts, plan for your trash service, run your water/sewer. Wait, Silver Co. is taking over, no it's some other realestate owners. Obviously my travel this week has made me delierious and sarcastic.

We don't need this (posted by imready , Mar. 21, 2008 7:49 pm)   
We don't need the traffic a theme park will bring. If a theme park can't make money without our paying them then they can't make money to pay taxes. This is a scheme to get us finance their stupid water park. Put it in Anacostia. DC needs this more than us.

LOL! (posted by Blk97F150 , Mar. 21, 2008 3:47 pm)   
This is funny stuff. First a 'consultant' tells the city exactly what they want to hear (as they are cashing the check....)... then Silver threatens a tax increase!! lol Ultimately, this will pass though.... everything gets passed when people are threatened with 'if we don't, we'll just raise your taxes'. Whether its good for the area or not, doesn't matter.

Concerned Yokels (posted by realitystory , Mar. 21, 2008 3:08 pm)   
If Kalahari takes over the entire city completely, which we all know is their Grand Master Plan, the city will no longer have to hire and pay outside consultants to review the obvious. Something might actually progress from start to finish without lichen growth.

Pay attention.... (posted by URkiddingright , Mar. 21, 2008 2:28 pm)   
"She acknowledged that many of the costs she brought up--a third fire station and improvements to Fall Hill Avenue among them--would be necessary regardless of whether Kalahari comes to town"

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.