Featured Advertisers
Mon, Nov. 30  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

-

Visit the Photo Place

Coal: For clean, affordable electricity

Blackburn commentary on coal

Date published: 5/5/2008

RICHMOND--

Virginia will be using more coal for electricity production in the future than it has in the past for a number of reasons that become more evident and pressing every day.

We cannot go on squandering limited natural gas supplies on unlimited burning for electricity production when coal is so much more economical. Nor can we expect to see more nuclear power any time soon, not if Congress continues to drag its feet in appropriating funds for loan guarantees to support construction of new nuclear plants. These nuclear plants, which are estimated to cost at least $7 billion each, are not expected to begin commercial operation until 2016, at the earliest.

Nor can we deface our Virginia coastline and countryside with towering wind turbines on a massive scale, when coal plants require much less space and are so much more reliable. While coal provides more than 50 percent of the electricity used in Virginia and nationally, renewable sources such as solar and wind supply less than 2 percent and supply only peak power because of their unreliability.

Coal plants produce "base-load" electricity, the power that is available around the clock, to keep traffic lights on and household appliances performing when the button is pushed. This is beyond the ability of solar and wind energy, which are available only when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing at the necessary velocity. Wind is an intermittent source of electricity, as Texans recently discovered when the electricity grid had to cut power to some offices and factories when wind speed dropped--and with it, electricity produced by the state's wind farms.

Advocates of renewable energy shudder at the very mention of coal, arguing that it can never be made acceptable from an environmental standpoint. But contrary to the assertions of environmentalists, coal is neither dead nor dying.


1  2  3  Next Page  


Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 5/5/2008


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 3 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Mercury emissions... (posted by Liberal , May 5, 2008 8:42 pm)   
Is it true that the Wise County plant will emit over 4 times the amount of mercury per-megawatt of Dominion's Clover station in Halifax? Mercury is a neurotoxin linked to developmental damage in fetuses, children & adults. A new study from The University of TX Health Science Center shows a statistically significant link between pounds of industrial release of mercury and increased autism rates. It also shows a statistically significant association between autism risk and distance from the mercury source.

Windmills... (posted by Liberal , May 5, 2008 8:34 pm)   
Actually, windmills are far more attractive than air that kills people. It’s one thing to talk about clean coal and carbon-capture, but isn’t the Wise County coal-fired power plant approved by the SCC a conventional coal facility? Not one cent of the $1.6 billion to build the plant will go to address the plant's global warming pollution, either now or at any time in the future.

Another special interest (posted by winwood , May 5, 2008 9:53 am)   
Blah, blah, blah. Lots of nice words. Coal plants are still the dirtiest form of electricity there is....by a long shot. Lets give nuclear, wind, and natural gas priority over coal, until coal cleans up its act.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.