Fredericksburg.com - Stafford decides the meaning of family

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Stafford decides the meaning of family
Stafford deals with issues of unrelated people who live together

Date published: 6/18/2008

BY KAFIA HOSH

Stafford County officials have limited the number of unrelated people living in a single-family home and added a definition of a "family" to the county code.

After a brief public hearing last night, the Board of Supervisors amended the zoning ordinance to allow for only four people not related by blood, marriage, adoption or guardianship to live in a residential dwelling. The 5-2 vote included a definition of a family as "a group of people living together as a single housekeeping unit."

The ordinance does not include group homes, such as those for the handicapped or those licensed by the Department of Social Services.

However, some supervisors were concerned the ordinance could marginalize certain groups of people. It first came to the board in April, shortly after the Illegal Immigration Task Force public hearings held earlier this year. At the hearings, several residents complained about overcrowded homes and driveways overflowing with cars. Some of them suspected illegal immigrants or day laborers lived in the homes.

"I tend to agree that the perception could be, maybe, that this is directed toward a particular group, whether it be true or not," said Griffis--Widewater Supervisor Bob Woodson, who, along with Chairman George Schwartz, voted against the measure.

But other supervisors said overcrowded homes are safety concerns that cause noise pollution and residential streets crammed with cars.

"What we miss are the gross abuses of the occupancies on homes and the impact those gross abuses have on the neighbors," said Garrisonville Supervisors Mark Dudenhefer.

Concerns also were raised about how the ordinance would impact unmarried couples living together with their children.

"The reality is there's a lot of those situations out there," said Aquia Supervisor Paul Milde. "We need to give exceptions to parents of the same child."

Supervisors amended the ordinance to allow for two unrelated heads of households to live together with any number of offspring, foster, step or adopted children.

Patrick Walsh, one of just a handful of speakers at the public hearing, said the ordinance could adversely affect unrelated immigrants who live together to eventually become self-sufficient and to people who rent out rooms in their homes.

"People taking care of people, do we really need to destroy that aspect?" he asked. "People are just trying to get by these days."

The original proposal was more stringent, allowing no more than three unrelated people to live together. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the resolution.

Kafia Hosh: 540/735-1977
Email: khosh@freelancestar.com


OTHER LOCALITIES

Spotsylvania County passed a similar zoning ordinance last year to regulate how many people can occupy a bedroom, living room and dining room.

Spotsylvania supervisors also approved a zoning amendment that defines a "family" as one or more people related by blood or marriage, together with any number of children, and no more than two roomers or boarders; or no more than three unrelated persons (eight if handicapped).

Loudoun County defines family as one or more persons related by blood and marriage with any number of children and no more than four unrelated persons.

The town of Culpeper limits unrelated persons allowed in a home to five.

Prince William County, Fredericksburg limit unrelated persons allowed in a home to three.

Herndon limits unrelated persons allowed in a home to four. The city of Fairfax limits unrelated persons in a home to three.

--Dan Telvock



Read more stories about Caroline
Date published: 6/18/2008



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 18 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

good ol' stafford (posted by mikester , June 19, 2008 2:44 pm)    0 likes
I'm glad the government finally decided what a family is for me. If they would only tell me what to think life would be so much easier. It's good if it'll push illegals somewhere else

This ordinance will rarely (if ever) be enforced. (posted by kenderr , June 18, 2008 9:36 pm)    0 likes
There are many archaic laws on the books concerning social mores in Virginia that are never enforced. This ordinance will just enable local officials to take action against the most egregious violators. If one lives in a neighborhood where there are none of these overcrowded flop houses, it's easy say you don't want the government to stick it's nose into people's private lives. As soon as one of these places pop up next door, you'll be screaming for some intervention by that same government.

The problem (posted by GaryShorts , June 18, 2008 9:08 pm)    0 likes
is that they are trying to define what a relationship is or what a house is or what marriage is. If the real problem is number of cars in a driveway or illegal immigration, then the ordinance should state that and not take away people's rights by defining something else or forcing people to prove their blood relationship to their family.

so... (posted by riley6 , June 18, 2008 8:33 pm)    0 likes
So according to this ordinance, two unmarried couples could not share a 2 bedroom house? I think politicians are getting too much into our business!

hold on here (posted by jerry2 , June 18, 2008 8:15 pm)    0 likes
why can't you put a limit on cars in yards , is it a sale lot, they can't be having a reunion everyday, sound like the county is passing the buck

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio