Featured Advertisers
Sat, Sep. 04  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS | ALERTS |
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Road projects on the ballot

Stafford finalizes transportation bond referendum language and answers questions from the public on the upcoming election-day issue.

Date published: 10/17/2008

by Jonas Beals

Stafford voters get to make four separate decisions on the Nov. 4 ballot. None hit closer to home than the transportation bond referendum.

If passed, the referendum authorizes the county to issue bonds worth up to $70 million. Effectively, the county will take on debt in order to pay for a number of specific road projects.

Transportation continues to be a major issue in Stafford. Population growth has led to congested roadways, and safety is a concern in some areas. At the same time, the slumping economy has dimmed the county's short-term financial outlook, and the Virginia Department of Transportation plans to reduce service across the state after losing billions of dollars in funding.

Voters will determine whether this is the time to improve Stafford's transportation infrastructure, as well as decide on national contests.

A transportation referendum failed in 2006.

Politicians take care of their own publicity ahead of an election, but referendums can't exactly shake hands and kiss babies. County staff is responsible for getting the word out to make sure residents are able to make an informed decision.

That would be done via a mailer, newspaper advertising and informational meetings. The first of three meetings was held last night.

Prior to the information session, supervisors convened to finalize language used in the mailer and brochure.

There was some concern surrounding the explanation of how the debt service on the bonds would be paid.

In the end, the board adopted language proposed by Supervisor Harry Crisp that lists the revenue streams available to pay the debt service on the bond. It also allows that money from the general fund may be needed if revenue streams are insufficient.

"We want to put the list of projects in front of the voters and let them make their decision based on good, clear information," Crisp said.

Supervisors Bob Woodson and Paul Milde voted against the language, wanting a more explicit reference to a possible tax rate increase.

"Referring to a tax increase would be speculative and misleading," Supervisor Cord Sterling said.

Supervisor Joe Brito agreed, adding that there are a number of ways for the county to cover shortfalls without raising taxes.

Only four Stafford residents attended last night's meeting, and most questions centered on the shaky economy and subsequent potential for funding shortfalls and tax increases. County Administrator Anthony Romanello, Transportation Administrator Fulton DeLamorton and three supervisors were on hand to answer those questions.

Brito, Sterling and Crisp agreed that while the timing of the referendum isn't perfect, it might be the best chance for the county to address transportation infrastructure problems.

There are two more information meetings scheduled: Oct. 22 at Park Ridge Elementary and Oct. 28 at Berea Fire and Rescue Station. Both meetings start at 7:00 p.m.

To reach Jonas Beals: 540/368-5036
Email: jbeals@freelancestar.com


The Stafford transportation bond referendum, as it will appear on the Nov. 4 ballot:

QUESTION: Shall Stafford County, Virginia, contract a debt and issue its general obligation bonds in the maximum amount of seventy million dollars ($70,000,000) for the purpose of paying the costs, in whole or in part, of the following transportation improvement projects: 1. Warrenton Road (Route 17); 2. Garrisonville Road (Route 610); 3. Ferry Road (Route 606); 4. Courthouse Road (Route 630); 5. Truslow Road (Route 652); 6. Telegraph Road (Route 637); 7. Courthouse Road (Route 630) Railroad Bridge; 8. Pedestrian improvements; 9. Kellogg Mill Road (Route 651); 10. Youth Driver Task Force "Hot Spot" Traffic Safety Improvements: a. Jefferson Davis Highway (U.S. Route 1); b. Brooke Road (Route 608); c. Poplar Road (Route 616); d. Mountain View Road (Route 627); e. Rock Hill Church Road (Route 644)?

When all of the bonds are sold, the annual debt service is expected to be about $5.2 million.

However, a portion of the debt service is planned to be paid from special assessment districts. Debt service on the remainder of the bonds ($55.7 million of the bonds) is estimated at $4.2 million annually.

The county has five revenue streams dedicated to transportation, including gasoline sales tax, state recordation tax, interest earnings, Business Professional Occupational License tax and transportation impact fees. Sufficient funds are projected to be available from these sources to pay for the debt service for these bonds.

Should these be insufficient, money would come from the general fund.



Date published: 10/17/2008



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 3 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Designs First (posted by Hokiecow , Oct. 24, 2008 10:05 pm)   
I believe we need better roads in Stafford but I would like to see some thought put into designing the infrastructure here. 610 is insane! There needs to be more parallel roads and alternate route that are not residential. It seems like Stafford is more concerned about getting the businesses/residents in then fixing the problems after the fact.

Lost VDOT Funds (posted by DeanFetterolf , Oct. 17, 2008 11:44 am)   
When proposed, the bond have would leveraged VDOT funds to help with the projects. But after yesterdays VDOT amputations are those funds still there? If not how many of these projects could be completed? To suggest that a tax increase would not be necessary for roads and other expenses next year is an outright shell game.. The county and schools need nore than $20M next year just to break even and cover uncontrollable outside cost drivers such as insurance, pensions etc. See next weeks BOS agenda.

TAX INCREASES!!! (posted by WeimCity , Oct. 17, 2008 7:54 am)   
Something is not right when BOS start skirting around with hints that no taxes will be increased to pay for their folly. Future BOS regimes may very well raise taxes to fund this stupidity. Transportation is a Commonwealth responsibility - make Richmond fund the necessary improvements!

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.