Featured Advertisers
Tue, Sep. 07  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS | ALERTS |
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Stafford planners reined in with vote

Stafford supervisors changing planning procedures


Date published: 12/17/2008

BY JONAS BEALS

Tension between the Stafford County Board of Supervisors and its appointed Planning Commission was on display last night, and there wasn't a planning commissioner in the room.

Supervisors came out of a closed session and immediately passed a resolution directing the Planning Commission to bring any proposed zoning ordinance changes to the Board of Supervisors first before staff works on the issue, and before there can be a public hearing on the matter. Essentially, if the Planning Commission has an idea, it must first be vetted by the supervisors before any money can be spent on advertising or staff work.

The resolution, which passed 5-2 (Bob Woodson and George Schwartz dissenting), was an attempt by supervisors to gain an increased level of control over the Planning Commission.

"They need to ask us first before they spend county money on things that go nowhere," Paul Milde said. "This forces the Planning Commission to work more closely with the board. We don't even know these changes are coming when they get here."

Other board members did not feel that the idea was quite so constructive.

"It will completely emasculate the Planning Commission," Chairman George Schwartz said. "I don't want the responsibility of micromanaging the Planning Commission."

Milde has roundly criticized some of the new zoning changes, and feels that the impetus for them should rest with the county's legislative body rather than the Planning Commission. Without more oversight, he suggested, the commission may continue to waste county resources. Milde stated that he believes the current commission has passed more zoning amendments than have been passed in the previous 20 years combined.

"That would be negative?" Schwartz responded.

Woodson questioned the timing and the motivation behind the resolution. "This is a deliberate attempt to take power from the Planning Commission. This decision-making is really on the fly. It's arbitrary." In his estimation, the decision was made to favor developers.

In other business, Milde moved to request the General Assembly to consider enabling legislation to allow Stafford to add an at-large chairman to the Board of Supervisors. His motion followed a petition drive at county polls on Election Day. A heated discussion preceded the vote, with some supervisors expressing concern about how the signatures were obtained. The motion was defeated, 3-4 with Cord Sterling, Milde and Mark Dudenhefer in favor.

Supervisors also voted 5-2 to close county government offices on Inauguration Day, Jan. 20.

Jonas Beals: 540/368-5036
Email: jbeals@freelancestar.com



Date published: 12/17/2008



Most recent reader comments:

1 comment has been posted. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

At least there will be some sort of oversight (posted by ReadingOne , Dec. 17, 2008 7:17 am)   
on a commission with ulterior motives and absolutely no understanding of basic economic trickle down effects. As mighty as they propose to be, swinging their sabers to defeat the unholy developer and evil growth, they ignore those who try to help them understand the repercussions of their actions. Especially future fiscal repercussions. There will be those who defend this group but their motives need to be examined also. Now we need board members who have the background and knowledge to lead the county

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.