Featured Advertisers
Fri, Dec. 04  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

Last year's blue crab harvest was the lowest since 1945.
FILE/THE FREE LANCE-STAR

Visit the Photo Place

Bay group urges more protection for crabs CLEANING THE BAY

EPA, state governments need to do more to cut Bay pollution to protect imperiled blue crab

Date published: 12/30/2008

By RUSTY DENNEN

The Environmental Protection Agency and Chesapeake Bay states need to do more to cut pollution to protect critically low blue crab stocks.

That's one of the key recommendations in a report on the crustacean's plight released yesterday by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

Noting that the U.S. Department of Commerce has declared the crab fishery an economic disaster, CBF President William C. Baker said, "It is now well past time for the [EPA] to do its job.

"They should bring forward a plan to enforce the Clean Water Act and reduce Bay pollution to levels that will restore water quality," he added.

Baker was referring to a mandate by the agency to remove the Bay from its dirty waters list by 2010--a deadline that will not be met.

The report, "Bad Water and the Decline of Blue Crabs in the Chesapeake Bay," says pollution and over-harvesting threaten the viability of a resource and industry that, until now, has sustained generations of watermen.

Crabbing has historically been a thriving business on the lower Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers, but has declined in recent years.

The Bay's blue crab population plummeted from an estimated 791 million in 1990 to about 260 million in 2007, according to the report. Last year's harvest was the worst since record-keeping began in 1945.

Preliminary indications are that 2008 harvest was down even more in Virginia, but official numbers are not yet available.

Researchers found that dead zones kill an estimated 75,000 tons of bottom-dwelling clams and worms each year--enough to feed 60 million crabs annually.

Dead zones are created during summer months when nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus flow into the Bay, creating algae blooms. The algae then die off, consuming oxygen in the water, creating vast areas where marine life cannot survive.

Those dead zones also damage underwater grass beds which provide key nursery areas for crabs and fish.

According to the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, crabbing jobs fell 40 percent between 1998 and 2006, the latest year for which economic data are available. The institute estimates that the impact on restaurants, crab processors and wholesalers cost Virginia and Maryland about $640 million during the period.

While the number of crabs declines, the report says, unsustainable harvest efforts continue.

"For the last 10 years, management policies have allowed more crabs to be harvested than science dictates," said Bill Goldsborough, CBF senior fisheries scientist. "However, even with the current better management, we still need to reduce pollution if we want to see a healthy, robust crab population."

Earlier this year, Maryland and Virginia moved to further restrict crab harvests to prevent a collapse of the industry. The harvest of female crabs from October through April was banned, and female crabs can no longer be dredged from the southern end of the Bay.

Rusty Dennen: 540/374-5431
Email: rdennen@freelancestar.com


The Chesapeake Bay Foundation says federal and state governments could improve Bay water quality by:

Creating an enforceable cap on pollutants such as nitrogen and phosphorus.

Enforcing clean-water rules and regulations already on the books and creating new ones.

Shifting water-quality program funds to projects with the biggest potential to reduce pollution.

Including Bay water-quality programs in any forthcoming economic-stimulus package.

Expanding incentives to reduce pollution through tax credits and funds for innovative approaches.

ON THE NET

For more on the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, cbf.org



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 12/30/2008


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 5 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

are septic drainfields polluting the bay? (posted by larryg , Dec. 31, 2008 8:37 am)   
If so - then how are they polluting? Where is the data that shows how they pollute? If I can have a water supply source (a well) a hundred feet from my drain field, then why is it not polluted? No matter. If the truth is the truth - we need to be told the specifics - as well as what needs to be done to reduce pollution from septic fields - and what we should all advocate for - in terms of additional requirements to bring the Bay back to health. Why do we not have the information that we need to do this?

fish oil (posted by pfloyd , Dec. 30, 2008 9:14 pm)   
to really help the bay, the Government needs to STOP the Menhadden fishing on the east coast. The fish oil plant is wiping out the Menhadden stocks in the Bay. I have fished the bay my whole life, and it is gwtting worse and worse. It is going to be a dead zone if this keeps up. The omega fish oil plant is wiping out the Menhadden- they are filter feeders and actually clean the water. If they were left alone, the bay would be cleaner, and the crabs would have food.

Remember the crabbers .. (posted by wizards , Dec. 30, 2008 9:07 pm)   
We need to remember that a lot of people earn a living by crabbing the C Bay .. do the necessary to help these people.

only a problem (posted by VA_lover , Dec. 30, 2008 6:48 pm)   
when it becomes an inconvenience to humans. god forbid we can't eat anymore blue crabs cuz they done got all et up.

what would be the specific changes that we should do in the Fredericksburg Area (posted by larryg , Dec. 30, 2008 9:27 am)   
to do our part in helping to improve the Bay? What are the most important and urgent things for us to be doing and how much would those things cost? Don't we have to have clear and specific information with regard to our area to even know what we would or should do? Does Fredericksburg Area contribute specific harmful pollutants that we could decrease that would help the dead zones in the Bay? If so.. what are they and how much would we need to cut back and how would we go about doing it?

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.