Featured Advertisers
Fri, Nov. 20  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

Fredericksburg must rethink building plans

Time to reconsider Fredericksburg's courthouse plans.

Date published: 1/6/2009

PRIOR to my appointment to City Council, a decision was made to build a new court facility to address security and space requirements. This decision was made during far superior economic times. I question the comprehensive costs of this project in light of the current economic recession.

Moving forward with this proposal during an economic crisis would represent poor financial practice on behalf of the city. Numerous cost figures have been cited for the new courts complex, ranging from $45 million to $65 million, which translates into a real-estate tax increase of approximately 8 to 11.5 cents. Breaking these costs down into a dollar-per-square-foot measure (to gain some perspective) reveals a hefty price tag of $577 to $833 per square foot.

Although some argue that this calculation is unfair and that, for planning purposes, the construction cost is only $267 per square foot, I submit that this planning figure is still not only high, it also accounts only for construction costs of the facility and does not take into account the fact that comprehensive costs cannot be ignored or camouflaged, including acquiring the Wachovia Bank property and relocating the post office.

RSMeans, a leading supplier of construction-cost data for North America, estimates that average costs for courthouse construction range between $172 and $186 per square foot for an 80,000-square-foot building. The cost of the proposed Fredericksburg Courthouse Complex of 78,000 square feet is $267 per square foot--43.5 percent higher than the upper-end average for an 80,000 square-foot facility.

Judging from the architectural drawings presented to City Council, approximately 2.6 acres will need to be acquired. With a land acquisition of $7,100,000 and post office relocation allowance of $3,000,000, this equates to $3,884,615 an acre--pricey by any standard.

Furthermore, according to the feasibility study, the proposed 78,000-square-foot facility is not sufficient to meet future needs--even in the near term. Without the space necessary for the commonwealth's attorney's and sheriff's administrative offices (since they are not planned to be part of the new complex), the space requirements are 76,593 square feet in 2010 and 93,371 square feet by year 2030.


1  2  Next Page  


Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Read more stories about Fredericksburg
Date published: 1/6/2009


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 4 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

rehabing the current buildings is like (posted by PUBLICSRVNT , Jan. 6, 2009 8:18 pm)   
throwing money in a sinking ship. If you knew anything about the judges here in the City you would know that they don't expect "grand" courtrooms or offices. This City needs to wake up and face the fact that we need adequate facilites that have proper security. We just had ANOTHER murder in the City this morning. I wouldn't want to be a Judge, Clerk, Deputy or simply a witness in a case with the current security in these Courts. Something bad is going to happen to some innocent person...then what?

rehabing the current buildings is like (posted by PUBLICSRVNT , Jan. 6, 2009 8:18 pm)   
throwing money in a sinking ship. If you knew anything about the judges here in the City you would know that they don't expect "grand" courtrooms or offices. This City needs to wake up and face the fact that we need adequate facilites that have proper security. We just had ANOTHER murder in the City this morning. I wouldn't want to be a Judge, Clerk, Deputy or simply a witness in a case with the current security in these Courts. Something bad is going to happen to some innocent person...then what?

Brad Ellis is making sense. (posted by Chiswald , Jan. 6, 2009 11:50 am)   
This is no time to be building a $60 million courthouse.

Rehab the current building (posted by Mandrake , Jan. 6, 2009 10:15 am)   
and use trailers as courtrooms if you have to temporarily. Judges should have no say in how grand their office and courtroom has to be. These lawyers in black robes need to face reality...

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.