Featured Advertisers
Fri, Nov. 27  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.


Visit Kelly Hannon's blog: On the Road
View the Stafford County community page

TRANSPORTATION BOARD'S SIX-YEAR BUDGET CUTS $2 BILLION, KEEPS FALMOUTH UPGRADE

Commonwealth Transportation Board passes an updated long-range transportation budget

Date published: 2/14/2009

BY KELLY HANNON

Hoping to get a plan in place before President Obama signs the stimulus bill into law, Virginia's Commonwealth Transportation Board approved a six-year, $8.9 billion transportation budget yesterday.

The rare winter vote on the 2009-14 budget cut $2 billion worth of projects.

The state expects to receive $2.6 billion less than anticipated in transportation funding over the next six years from gas and real-estate taxes and car sales.

Projects in the Fredericksburg area that lost funding include a planned State Route 3 widening in Spotsylvania County, the second phase of the Spotsylvania Courthouse Bypass, widening U.S. 17 in Stafford County and the reconstruction of the Courthouse Road I-95 interchange in Stafford.

The budget kept $21 million to rebuild the Falmouth intersection at U.S. 1, Warrenton Road and Butler Road. The money will let construction move forward within the next six years.

Fredericksburg-area officials knew the cuts were coming.

A draft plan announced most of the cuts in December, and there were few changes.

Stafford Supervisor Cord Sterling is a member of the Commonwealth Transportation Board.

Sterling said he hopes some or all of the Fredericksburg-area projects that lost funding will be eligible to receive money from the federal stimulus package.

Kelly Hannon: 540/374-5436
Email: khannon@freelancestar.com



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 2/14/2009


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 4 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

The Cost of Growth (posted by southwest , Feb. 14, 2009 4:48 pm)   
This is a perfect reason as to why Supervisor Marshall's pro-growth up-zoning proposal in Spotsylvania County should be defeated.

re: Future funding and localities land-use decisions (posted by larryg , Feb. 14, 2009 7:16 am)   
The funding meltdown has one positive outcome. Local elected can no longer make land-use decisions and claim the the infrastructure needed to deal with the growth will be provided by VDOT. To a certain extent, this is why VDOT finances went south. They had so many local projects that were dealing with local land-decisions that it overwhelmed their ability to build them all. The Six-Year plan was a handy device to tell the public that projects promised by their local elected were "on the list" .

smoke & mirrors? (posted by larryg , Feb. 14, 2009 7:12 am)   
Kelly, I went to the actual six year plan to look up the Falmouth project. Look Here: http://syip.virginiadot.org/LineItemDetail.asp? syp_scenario_id=149&line_item_id=28268&pf=LineItems. asp&pfn=Line+Items notice that the bulk of the funding is ANTICIPATED future Federal Funding ... they are assuming that the Federal SAFETEA will be re-authorized at some assumed funding level. Also - a question - why is this project called "RTE 218 - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS" ? thanks!

The State and the CTB Fail Again (posted by southwest , Feb. 14, 2009 7:08 am)   
If this doesn't convince Spotsylvania County to join VRE what will ??????Local governments can't depend on State Government or the CTB (Commonwealth Transportation Board) to address roadway needs within Spotsylvania County or the region. Local elected officials should know by now that roadway and other transportation projects for this region aren't a priority for the General Assembly or the CTB. I ask local elected officials to start thinking outside of the box, so that we can meet our transportation needs.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.