County's inaction costs its neighbors
Spotsylvania supervisors' indecisiveness on Virginia Railway Express has negative impact on county's neighbors
Date published: 3/8/2009
By DAN TELVOCK
In the more than two decades that Spotsylvania County supervisors have debated joining Virginia Railway Express, their indecisiveness has had a negative effect on their neighbors.
Matt Kelly, a Fredericksburg city councilman who serves on the VRE Operations Board, sent an e-mail to Spotsylvania Supervisor Jerry Logan in an attempt to persuade him to vote in favor of joining VRE.
Kelly told Logan that one of the reasons Stafford County and Fredericksburg are having financial challenges in funding their shares of the VRE subsidy is because of the estimated 1,000 Spotsylvania riders who take VRE trains.
"I've yet to hear a member of the Spotsylvania Board of Supervisors acknowledge these, and other impacts, Spotsylvania residents are having on our communities," Kelly wrote.
Area localities use a 2 percent gasoline sales tax to pay their share of VRE and administrative fees for the Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission, a regional agency that oversees commuter rail. The remainder of the tax revenue can be used for other transportation projects.
For the first time in Stafford's partnership with VRE, county leaders are seeing gas-tax revenue decline to a point where it no longer covers all the costs of the VRE subsidy and PRTC fees.
"Jerry [Logan] needs to understand that the reason Stafford is having this problem is because Spotsylvania has not got off their you-know-what and joined VRE," Kelly said during an interview.
Logan expressed concerns that if Spotsylvania joins, it could eventually have to dip into general tax dollars to fund VRE. Although fiscal 2010 estimates show the county could see an influx of $1.5 million extra from the gas tax, Logan fears the number will decrease rapidly because VRE funding levels are based on ridership and not population.
He said Spotsylvania's impact on its neighbors weighs heavily on his mind. But he's uneasy about voting to join VRE.
"I do feel that there is a fairness issue there," Logan said. "I am very sensitive to that."
Logan questions how PRTC comes up with the figure that Spotsylvania will get $1.5 million in extra gas-tax revenue when Stafford's is declining. "Do they actually have some hard data that they are using, or are they just grabbing numbers out of the air?"
Al Harf, executive director of the PRTC, said that when producing an estimate for Spotsylvania, he used an average yield of revenue dollars per capita.
"That's why the Spotsylvania estimate is slightly higher than the Stafford estimate even though populations of the two jurisdictions are basically the same."
Dan Telvock: 540/374-5438 Email: dtelvock@freelancestar.com
What if?
| ESTIMATED REVENUES, COSTS
The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission estimates that if Spotsylvania County joined VRE on July 1, 2009, local jurisdictions' costs and revenues for fiscal 2010 would be:
Spotsylvania:
Gas-tax revenue: $3,069,619
VRE subsidy: $1,523,164
PRTC fee: $44,500
Available for other projects: $1,501,955
Stafford:
Gas-tax revenue: $2,995,020
VRE subsidy: $2,653,037
PRTC fee: $52,200
If Spotsylvania did not join, Stafford's VRE subsidy would be $2,971,727.
Fredericksburg:
Gas-tax revenue: $1 million
VRE subsidy: $446,222
PRTC fee: $18,200
If Spotsylvania did not join, Fredericksburg's VRE subsidy would be $508,503. |
|
Read more stories about Spotsylvania
Date published: 3/8/2009
Most recent reader comments:
That's Ok folks
(posted by
Ron_C
, Mar. 17, 2009 8:37 pm)  
Once Spotsy's gas tax isn't meeting it's required payments to VRE it can join Fburg and Stafford in the chorus demanding that Caroline and King George join. Thats how these sort of ponzi schemes work, by drawing in more and more suckers that fall for the con. Hopefully Spotsy will be smart enough to stay out of the VRE con game.
VRE Stinks
(posted by
MrWonderful
, Mar. 17, 2009 11:49 am)  
Mr. Logan, you screwed us once with your vote on rural zoning. Please don't do it again with VRE.
Mr.
(posted by
thomaye2
, Mar. 16, 2009 6:41 pm)  
For 20 years, the Spotsy Board has refused to enter the 20th Century and they continue to do it in the 21st century, while the world changes around us, leavimg us behind.
I guess we'll have to wait another 20 years until this Board is replaced.by people who SEE the benefits of joining the VRE.
I haven't heard the Board talk about lowering our real estate tax rate because of the actual lowered value of our homes!!!
Mr. Kelly, you've got to understand...
(posted by
dr428
, Mar. 11, 2009 7:57 pm)  
we're tired of the vocal minority of people stirring the pot and whining for something using smoke and mirror logic just so the end result benefits the stakeholders. You say VRE will bring wonderful jobs and business to the area? How is WV able to pull off getting gov't offices and other business growth in the panhandle area? They don't have VRE, or Amtrak, or anything... except hard-working leaders who back the proper projects. And not swindling their neighbor gov'ts to make the same mistakes they did
they bring more in disposable income?
(posted by
larryg
, Mar. 10, 2009 3:50 pm)  
and they demand more expensive services - including
subsidized commuting!
They put pressure on the price of housing - driving the cost
up so that folks who work locally have a harder time finding
a truly "affordable" home - of which local governments
then turn around and talk about the things they can do to
help the affordable housing problem.
We go full circle - because our policies for commuting are
the same policies that cause affordable housing problems.
|