Featured Advertisers
Tue, Nov. 24  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.


Visit Portsia Smith's blog: Portsia Faces Life
Visit Portsia Smith's blog: Caroline Crossroads
View the Caroline County community page

New noise ordinance silenced in Caroline

A Virginia Supreme Court ruling stalls decision on a proposed noise ordinance in Caroline

PDF: Click here to read the Virginia Supreme Court ruling

Date published: 5/2/2009

BY PORTSIA SMITH

The current noise ordinance in Caroline County that measures sound with a decibel meter may stay in place after all.

A Virginia Supreme Court recently struck down a Virginia Beach law similar to a proposed ordinance in Caroline. It allowed law-enforcement officials to use their own judgment to decide whether to cite noise violators.

The justices unanimously ruled that the law cannot stand because it lacks measurable standards and leaves enforcement to the whim of police officers.

That means Caroline supervisors will have to rethink a new ordinance or buy new equipment to keep the current one in place.

The proposed ordinance would base violations on "reasonableness" instead of a specific decibel level. Exemptions include noise from lawful hunting, public celebrations, alerts for an emergency and any noise within the boundaries of Fort A.P. Hill or the Peumansend Creek Regional Jail.

The penalties would range from a $100 fine for the first offense to a $1,000 fine and/or a year in jail for a fourth offense within a year.

Nearly 30 residents spoke out during a public hearing Tuesday night--most in opposition to the proposed ordinance.

Richard Bradley, who owns 13 acres in Chilesburg, said the ordinance has a lot of holes in it.

"You're trying to create an ordinance that covers everybody," he said. "But don't put a straitjacket on everybody to protect a few."

Sparta residents Douglas and Cynthia Banks said barking dogs in their neighborhood have caused them to lose years' worth of sleep. They both supported the proposed ordinance.

A handful of people were concerned with the lack of an exception for hobby or target shooting.

"That's what makes the rural life rural," argued Peter Fisher of Port Royal.

Harry Snodgrass, who lives off of Jericho Road in Ruther Glen and owns a dog kennel, had a list with 170 signatures of others who were against the new ordinance.

"I don't think you need a new amendment, I think you need to get Sheriff [Tony] Lippa some new equipment, and I'll be the first to make a donation," he said.

The current noise ordinance, established in 1987, calls for sheriff's deputies to use handheld sound-level meters to determine whether noise is excessive.

Lippa said the meters are old. Last summer, he called the devices ineffective because they pick up sounds other than the noise being targeted and said deputies don't use them.

Supervisors did not vote on the ordinance and plan to have another public hearing once they come up with another solution.

Board Chairman and Madison District Supervisor Wayne Acors said they probably shouldn't have made a change.

"There is an ordinance on the books today. We thought we were improving it," he said. "But evidently we did not."

Portsia Smith: 540/374-5419
Email: psmith@fredericksburg.com


Other Fredericksburg-area localities that use the reasonable-standard method include Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania and King George counties and the towns of Orange and Culpeper.

Stafford and Westmoreland counties and Colonial Beach measure noise by decibel level.

Culpeper County has the decibel-measuring ordinance on its books. Orange County does not have a noise ordinance.



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Read more stories about Caroline
Date published: 5/2/2009


Most recent reader comments:

1 comment has been posted. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

So wait (posted by wideopenspace , May 2, 2009 8:00 am)   
If Va Beach's law which was going to be like the the City of Fred if not legal by the VA Supreme Court, does that mean the City and others who have that same law are illegally being enforced? Where's a lawyer to ask that to?

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.