Fredericksburg.com - Limiting usage to protect reservoirs

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Limiting usage to protect reservoirs
Stafford looks at limiting uses around reservoirs

Date published: 6/17/2009

By JONAS BEALS

Stafford supervisors agree they don't want anyone swimming in the county's sources of drinking water, but they voted yesterday to gather more input about restricting additional development near its reservoirs.

Current ordinances allowed supervisors some latitude to allow activities around reservoirs on a case-by-case basis. Swimming and gasoline-powered boats already were prohibited on Smith and Abel lakes. But the new ordinances are more specific and also would apply to the new Rocky Pen Run Reservoir when it comes online in about two years.

The first ordinance proposes creating a reservoir-protection overlay district.

The ordinance could create a series of four concentric areas around reservoirs where a varying degree of activities would be limited. For instance, property owners would not be allowed to disturb vegetation within 200 feet of the water's edge.

On a 4-1 vote, the supervisors sent that ordinance to the Planning Commission for further discussion and a public hearing. Supervisor Paul Milde voted against the measure and Supervisor Cord Sterling was absent. Supervisor Joe Brito abstained, explaining that he owns property that will border the new reservoir.

"This obviously strives to fix a problem," Milde said. "I'm trying to understand what that problem is."

Milde went on to suggest that the ordinance was a downzoning in disguise. Supervisor Mark Dudenhefer agreed.

"This looks like an attempt to stop growth," Dudenhefer said. "We haven't had any problems that I'm aware of. Regulations like this could get to the point of being silly."

Jeff Harvey, Stafford's director of planning and zoning, felt that while there might not be an immediate problem, it would be a smart way to protect drinking water in the county.

"This ordinance is trying to prevent a problem. There is no documented problem right now," he said. "This is a forward-thinking proposal."

A similar ordinance was developed by the Utilities Commission. The terminal reservoir ordinance was adopted by the board with an identical 4-1 vote. Most notably, the ordinance will specifically prohibit swimming, wading and gas-powered motors for water-quality and liability reasons.

It also would prohibit building in a 200-foot buffer zone around a reservoir, a measure designed to eliminate the situation that arose on Abel Lake, where property owners built docks into the reservoir.


1  2  Next Page  


Date published: 6/17/2009



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 6 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Don't let fish live in that water (posted by grillwagon , June 17, 2009 8:30 pm)    0 likes
Cause fish poop in the water.

"This looks like an attempt to stop growth," Dudenhefer said (posted by Einstein , June 17, 2009 12:25 pm)    0 likes
It is terrifying to consider that an ignorant shortsighted individuals are in position to make terrible decisions that can impact something as critical as the quality of drinking water for generations to come.

It's our water quality for goodness sakes (posted by Dana1 , June 17, 2009 9:04 am)    0 likes
We need to keep bodies & gasoline out. I support the decision.

Other ideas for the ordinance (posted by Jerkules , June 17, 2009 8:38 am)    0 likes
They should consider installing wild animal traps as well, Just in case tigers move into the immediate area surrounding the reservoir. Also, perhaps something to deter mechanized killer robots, while they’re exploring possible future problems.

A forward-thinking proposal to prevent a problem (posted by Mojomama , June 17, 2009 7:41 am)    0 likes
Sounds like good government to me. Especially when the same practices are already in place in surrounding jurisdictions.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio