Featured Advertisers
Fri, Jul. 30  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS | ALERTS |
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.



Visit Kelly Hannon's blog: On the Road

VRE WELCOMES SPOTSY

VRE agrees to Spotsylvania's conditions for membership; Operations Board approves membership agreement

Date published: 8/22/2009

By KELLY HANNON

WOODBRIDGE

--The Virginia Railway Express Operations Board has agreed to Spotsylvania's conditions to join the train system.

VRE's Chief Executive Officer Dale Zehner said, "Everything they wanted, they got."

Spotsylvania will have a passenger train station in two years, and a third track extended to the station.

VRE will try to keep Spotsylvania's subsidy at a rate not exceeding proceeds collected through a 2 percent gasoline tax at the county's gas stations.

And it will let Spotsylvania defer payments to VRE and the Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission the first three years it belongs to the organizations.

"I think we've got an agreement we can live with," said Matt Kelly, a Fredericksburg councilman and Operations Board member.

Stafford supervisor Paul Milde said most of the board's closed-session debate Friday morning was about legal requirements, not the policy substance of the county's conditions.

With about 1,000 Spotsylvania residents riding VRE already, the county has been a user of the system for a long time, Milde said. "We're just trying to make it official," he said.

Spotsylvania's joining VRE involves three legal documents: A membership agreement between VRE and Spotsylvania, an amendment to VRE's master agreement governing the entire system and an amendment to a Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission agreement.

All of the approved agreements are effective Feb. 15.

That date was chosen after the Spotsylvania Board of Supervisors voted 4-3 Tuesday night to make its membership with VRE effective that day.

Two county supervisors that voted to join VRE are up for re-election in November, and are facing opponents who oppose membership.

D.J. McGuire, a Republican who opposes joining VRE, is challenging Spotsylvania board member Gary Skinner, who was instrumental in getting the agreement approved on a 4-3 vote.


1  2  Next Page  


Date published: 8/22/2009



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 10 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Another Perspective (posted by MattKelly , Aug. 23, 2009 8:50 pm)   
GRice74-We do have a regional comprehensive transportation plan called the 2035CLRP. And VRE is part of this plan. On the issue of subsidies Corey Stewart of the Prince William County Supervisors recently made an interesting point to consider, "We are subsidizing people in the rural areas, too," he said. "The cost of constructing and maintaining a rural road in comparison to the number of people who live on it is enormous."

Blitzburg (posted by winwood , Aug. 23, 2009 9:02 am)   
Sorry Blitzburg, I can't resist....did you consider "Cash for Clunkering" that 34 gallon beast of yours? Seriously though, I believe the vast majority of vehicles have half the gas tank you have and twice the mileage efficiency.

Don't be fooled by liberal's like jamestkirk (posted by blitzburgh , Aug. 22, 2009 7:06 pm)   
When they defend raising taxes, one of the liberal elitist tactics is to talk down to you. "You're already paying it, you just don't know it because you're ignorant". '

My Silverado has a 34 gallon tank winwood (posted by blitzburgh , Aug. 22, 2009 6:42 pm)   
$2.50 x 2% = .05 x 34gal = $1.70 right now. At $3.50per gal = $2.38 per tank full. At $4.00 per gal. = $2.72 per tank full (Almost $3.00) and we all know gas is going up. $2-3$ per tank full is a hefty tax don't you think.

They say there's a sucker born every minute . . . (posted by GRice74 , Aug. 22, 2009 10:37 am)   
In this case, it's a whole county. Four members of our BoS have seriously let us down, & voters aren't likely to forget that. Its really too bad since those members have done some good also. But this issue may well turn out to be the key one - despite the good they've done. In the least, it'll cost all county residents millions of dollars (to build the station) & possibly a lot more - all to support a few hundred residents, & to the detriment of a truly comprehensive regional transportation solution.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.