VENTING FEAR, FRUSTRATION
Remarks shows emotion of health care debate
BY EMILY BATTLE
Date published: 9/4/2009
BY EMILY BATTLE
Mary Burge is not one of those people who go to political rallies.
But the Spotsylvania County resident was one of about 1,800 people who made their way to the Fredericksburg Expo and Convention Center last night for Democratic Sen. Mark Warner's forum on health care reform.
Burge, who owns her own business, stood with small signs made of manila folders affixed to wooden rulers that read, "tort reform now" and "out of control spending," among other things.
Like just about everybody who has weighed in on this debate, she agrees that something needs to be done about the skyrocketing cost of health care. But she doesn't understand how an already heavily indebted federal government can afford what's being proposed.
"I have five grandchildren, and it scares me that they're going to have to pay for this," Burge said.
Ken Brantley never really sought the political spotlight, either.
But the Richmond ophthalmologist stood in the Expo Center parking lot yesterday, white coat slung over his shoulder, ready to walk in to Warner's forum.
When Brantley's wife left her previous job to come work for his practice, she figured she would get her insurance through her new job.
But when she discovered she was pregnant in the middle of that transition, she was declined by his insurer. And she missed the window to buy COBRA coverage through her previous job.
"I remember my wife crumpled up in a ball, and she said, 'I just can't believe this could happen to us,'" Brantley said.
As the crowd at last night's forum demonstrated, the national debate over health care is emotional, personal and far from simple.
Questions from the audience quickly turned into heated political speeches, and at times so many people started yelling that it was hard to tell which side they were yelling for.
For Fredericksburg resident Scott Weiss, the health care debate stirs up his belief that modern American government has moved too far from the intentions of its founding fathers.
"There is no place in the constitution where health care is mentioned," Weiss said. "Maybe there should be a place for it, but if there is, then you need to change the constitution to do that."
He thinks other legislation, like the energy bill that recently passed the house, also oversteps government's authority.
Date published: 9/4/2009
Most recent reader comments:
I don't think anyone disagrees
(posted by
outsidethebox
, Sep. 4, 2009 1:06 pm)  
that INSURANCE REFORM is needed. Costs are out of control. Torte reform is also needed. Yes, it accounts for a small percentage of overall insurance cost, but when doctors have huge annual premiums because of lawsuits filed to protect themselves from lawsuits, it is certainly an areas that warrants scrutiny. The ability to purchase insurance across state lines would help. The public option divides the country. Scrap that; expand medicaid coverage to include the qualified, uninsured.
Where was all this passion when where goin to war?
(posted by
Einstein
, Sep. 4, 2009 11:37 am)  
Baffling.
Where was the "fear and frustration" about the decision to commit our young men and women to combat in Iraq? Granted, there were no town hall meetings about that -- probably the most important decision a president can make. He simply fabricated a justification and went ahead and did it.
But, try to reform a broken health care system and its the apocalypse. Baffling.
Very happy to see the FLS making an effort
(posted by
mustang2
, Sep. 4, 2009 6:02 am)  
to cover these issues in an honest and unbiased manner. THANK YOU. There are two sides and in the past newspapers have covered only one.
|