Featured Advertisers
Tue, Nov. 24  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

-

Visit the Photo Place

Health care for all is a basic human right

Date published: 10/11/2009

I've been to a dermatologist for acne. I had asthma when I was younger but outgrew it. Are these really "pre-existing conditions" that will cause me to be denied health insurance?

If I forget to mention them, will I be billed after an operation for the whole cost of an expensive surgery? Why do pre-existing conditions even matter?

In 1948, the United Nations declared health care to be a human right. Everyone should have access to it. We need to put people's health over corporate profits.

I believe the first step in accomplishing this is to pass a bill that includes a public health insurance option.

I'm not saying the government is perfect. But I also don't hear too many people complaining about government-run Medicare.

A public option existing with private insurance would allow for more choice and competition. It would also be an important step in offering quality and affordable health care to everyone.

Natalie Grossman

Stafford



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 10/11/2009


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 45 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

the Republicans had six years when they (posted by larryg , Oct. 12, 2009 8:32 pm)   
owned both houses and the Presidency lock stock and barrel and what did they do about health care? why, of course they waited until the Dems were in to make their suggestions. If their suggestions are so good why did they not implement them when they could have?

Democrats dont care for bipartisanship (posted by testexam , Oct. 12, 2009 6:59 pm)   
Republicans have offered several alternatives to Democrats' health care plans. GOP proposals usually include strengthening employer-provided insurance and offering tax benefits for those who buy coverage on their own. Democratic-controlled committees have routinely rejected Republican plans. as long as Dems want the pseudo-success of their 5 HR Bill versions to force on americans, GOPs version of the healthcare bill will never see light of day. http://blunt.house.gov/Read.aspx?ID=1140

Yes you may reccomend (posted by Theresa61 , Oct. 12, 2009 1:07 pm)   
and anger is good, so are debates, voting, and so should there be choice in who the people pay for health insurance. You see in America dreams can come true. I want to be a teacher, or a cop, or a pizza delivery man. That's my dream. But I also want to live healthy without fear that some day I'll be to sick to bring the pizza to your door and with lousy insurance that won't cover the cost to get me back to work sooner or if even at all.

Why fight progress (posted by Theresa61 , Oct. 12, 2009 12:46 pm)   
The people need a fix, not a bandaid to cover up the wound or tape to keep it all together. If their only option to fix it is to opt for public health to at least cover the cost of health "care" then why fight against it. In a free market why shouldn't the govt offer competition, cause right now it seems all the insurance companies rule and the people lose. There's more to a fix than whats up front but at least people can be healthy enough to put up a fight for the rest.

cont (posted by kspecial , Oct. 12, 2009 12:45 pm)   
Lux argues that big changes have never occurred gradually - nor have they been spread randomly over our history. Rather, they have been concentrated in these periods of "big change." In each, a cascade of progressive innovation took place over a short period of time, after years of right wing opposition. I'm sad to say this golden opportunity Bush and the neocons handed Obama and the Democrats is being squandered. They should have just rammed through their agenda. (See, now I'm angry with THEM.)

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.