Featured Advertisers
Tue, Nov. 24  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

It's news vs. opinion: Give Fox a break

News vs. opinion: Give Fox a break

Date published: 10/21/2009

Leonard Pitts, columnist for the Miami Herald, was on the editorial page of The Free Lance-Star recently offering his criticism of the Fox News channel ["Even a blind Fox digs up an occasional ACORN," Oct. 15].

Perhaps it was in support of criticism of Fox coming from the White House?

Mr. Pitts argues that he does not consider the Fox News channel "a credible news source."

As proof, he listed what he characterized as false claims (in his words, "recent lowlights") made by Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity, all at Fox.

These men are not news reporters, and Mr. Pitts knows that. As does he, they offer commentary and opinions on the news, not news itself.

Mr. O'Reilly is host of the No. 1-rated cable talk show. Mr. Hannity is described by Fox as a talk show host. Mr. Beck's program is described as "the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment." None of these professionals is a newscaster.

If Mr. Pitts wanted to comment on the actual news at Fox, he knows that actual news comes from reporters like Bret Baier, Fox News anchor. Yet he does not quote Mr. Baier; he quotes people like Mr. O'Reilly, Mr. Beck, and Mr. Hannity.

Deceptively calling Fox commentaries "news" and then labeling Fox as "not credible" for news is well, deceptive.

So why would Mr. Pitts offer his commentary without integrity and honesty? Would it have something to do with his writing his own "lowlight" while falsely accusing others of doing the same? Does Mr. Pitts know the word hypocrisy?

Harold Hoffler

Stafford



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 10/21/2009


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 158 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Now, before everyone freaks out......... (posted by fireball , Oct. 24, 2009 1:47 pm)   
I posted that because I believe administrations of both parties, past and present, have been guilty of over-stepping their bounds trying to exert influence over the press. It is the job of the media and press to be the eyes of the American public-whether the government likes it or not. It is not the government's job to judge the legitimacy of any media outlet. That's why I was so pleased and relieved to see the media pool stand up for FNC when the administration tried to exclude them the other day.

Fascism defined (posted by fireball , Oct. 24, 2009 1:09 pm)   
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us/politics/23fox.html I purposely chose NYT to show this is being noticed in a national media outlet not always on the best terms with FNC. Go to these links and read them. Reflect on some of this administration's activities in the last week with the press. Then honestly ask yourselves if you like what's happening in your government these days. I would be worried no matter which side of this administration you are on.

Right and Might (posted by leclare , Oct. 24, 2009 10:48 am)   
I guess, according to one scribble below, that success on the radio makes you right. If so, there really were WMDs (and we found them, according to Sean, if not the saner element of our country), Hitler was correct in what he did to the Jews, we should have interned Japanese citizens, etc. After all, these were popular items by popular people. And Vietnam really did attack us un the Gulf of Tonkein. Actually, Ann Coulter seems to be the only truly decent righty in the bunch, of course based on book sales.

Fox News (posted by nawlins , Oct. 23, 2009 10:03 pm)   
Fox News is an extremely successful television network and station. Their owner is a mastermind and did not become a billionaire by being a dumb person. With this being said, his demographics insofar as Fox News is that he has 100% viewership of the far right of this country. There numbers are estimated at 20,000,000. He has a dead lock on these people They also get liberal viewership as well as those on the left view it as a freakshow. At the end of the day, they make money, but hurt the GOP.

Fox News is the enemy of the American people (posted by UberMensch , Oct. 23, 2009 6:57 pm)   
Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL), told MSNBC's Ed Schultz on Wednesday. "They're the enemy of anybody who cares about health care in this country, the enemy of anybody who cares about educating their children, the enemy of anybody who wants energy independence or anything good for this country. And certainly the enemy of peace, there's no doubt about that. They are the enemy."

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.