Featured Advertisers
Snow Closings
Tue, Feb. 09  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

Unlike aging eyes, optics can be altered

Ken Perrotte's outdoor column

Date published: 11/12/2009

SOMETIMES the prob- lem is right before your eyes; other times, it might be your eyes.

A week into early muzzle-loader season, I had taken a doe at close range, and then managed to miss two bucks, one a 40-yard chip shot from a climbing treestand.

"This doggone gun must be losing its stuff," I thought.

A couple of weeks earlier, I struggled trying to re-zero the muzzleloader for a new 300-grain saboted projectile. Shot groups weren't tight at all.

I wondered if the Pyrodex propellant had too much age on it or if years of cleaning the bore with a ramrod tipped with bronze jags and pieces of cut flannel had damaged the muzzle crown enough to impair accuracy.

Of course, I first questioned the gun, missing the obvious clue that everything suddenly looked better downrange when I inadvertently looked through the Nikon Monarch scope with my reading glasses.

After missing the chip shot, I called for independent analysis to figure out if it was the gun, my eyes, or both. Longtime friend, expert hunter and shooting aficionado Thomas Burke of Woodford helped me diagnose the problem Sunday.

The "doctor" first examined the equipment. All the scope's rings and bases were tight.

"These Monarchs are good scopes," Burke said, "My guess is it's your eyes. We probably need to readjust the scope for your changing eyesight."

Now the scope and my eyes worked perfectly together when it was new. Heck, this scoped gun and I had taken mule deer at more than 200 yards distant when we were younger. Years ticked off and Lasik eye surgery improved my vision at a distance, but increased my dependence on reading glasses for things close in, including, obviously, scope reticles.

Burke loosened the adjustable eyepiece and told me to look through the scope toward the tops of some oak trees 100 yards away. The slender branches at the very top looked a little fuzzy, but that was what I was used to seeing.


1  2  3  Next Page  


Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 11/12/2009


What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.