Featured Advertisers
Snow Closings
Wed, Feb. 10  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

What's $6 million to the swells on the LOW board?

What's $6 million to the swells on the LOW board?

Date published: 11/13/2009

The new dam spillway at the Lake of the Woods, ordered by the state Soil and Water Commission, has caused widespread dissension among the LOW property owners.

And why not? The $6 million-plus project will cost every property owner $1,200, assuming the state kicks in with $1 million. Yes, fellow Virginia taxpayers, your taxes are helping to pay for this.

The dam was reclassified as a Class I Hazard dam in 2001, in clear violation of the state's own regulations. It did not then, and does not now, meet the requirements for a Class I Hazard dam.

The LOW board of directors passed a resolution on Sept. 16 stating the dam should only be a "Significant Hazard" dam, which would not require any spillway change.

But the board refused to challenge the state and simply agreed to capitulate. What's $6 million, give or take a few?

One person commented, "Let's just pay the money and get it behind us." News flash: Spending $1,200 just before Christmas is not putting it behind many of the LOW residents.

Maybe the board members forgot their first duty is to the LOW property owners, not to the state agencies.

In defense of the board, they can rest assured that when we get 37 inches of rain in 24 hours, sometime in the next 500 or 10,000 or 1 million years, the dam will survive.

Sometimes, those who are pushing safety to the limit really run amok.

There are several efforts currently under way, including petitions and pending lawsuits, to put an end to this travesty.

William E. Nowers

Orange



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 11/13/2009


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 7 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

hey, the regulations changed after (posted by monkeyfactory , Nov. 13, 2009 6:41 pm)   
this was built, of course i would expect the state to fork cash over

Da Sparky (posted by mz , Nov. 13, 2009 4:39 pm)   
40 feet of water in one storm. 4 more feet and your topped.By the way, you could LOW's dam in Lake Anna's spillway.

Here's a site about (posted by Tamerlane , Nov. 13, 2009 12:48 pm)   
another group of well-off folks who thought they did not need to improve their litt;e recreation dam: http://www.jaha.org/edu/flood/why/img/dam_gallery/index.html

Lake Anna (posted by sparky507 , Nov. 13, 2009 12:42 pm)   
also filled with that same storm (supposed to take years). What's your point mz?

LOW is so lucky! Anybody that knows (posted by mz , Nov. 13, 2009 9:31 am)   
about dams will tell you the spillway is not adequate for this size lake.When the dam was built, a proper spillway should have gone where the clubhouse beach is and the club elsewere. You need a big area to handle a spillway. The 10,000 year rain can happen tommorow. Initially experts said the lake would take years to fill,but it filled in one storm.Years ago LOW could have bought the upstream drainage area for $200K to better control run -off in the lake, but there was a Christmas that year also.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.