|
|
||
Tom Zoellner's op-ed on the arguments for and against uranium: Is it right for Pittsylvania County and Virginia? For Viewpoints, Jan. 31, 2010. Date published: 1/31/2010
NEW YORK --One of the biggest issues now brewing in Pittsylvania County can be blamed on hot water that got trapped in the granite about 2 million years ago. That water left underground residue that contained uranium, the oddly behaving mineral that fuels nuclear power plants and can blow up cities. What was once an unremarkable field of hay and tobacco owned by an old-line Virginia family is now considered the largest deposit of recoverable uranium ever discovered in the Eastern United States.Americans have been arguing over uranium since Hiroshima (with good reason) and there's a cloud of mythology hanging over the deposit in Southside Virginia. I want to examine some of the misinformation that's been tossed about. But first, a bit of history that doesn't go back as far as the Triassic Era. A team of geologists discovered the uranium on the Coles family farm 1978 when they happened to be driving by and noticed that their radiation-detection instruments were The market for nuclear power (never robust) sunk into a depression from which it has never truly recovered, and the Virginia General Assembly in 1982 seemed to put the seal Now the price is back up, the ore is again worth the price of digging, and nuclear power interests have discovered the power of a green message, pointing out that nuclear power emits almost no fumes that cause climate change. There is renewed investor interest in the tobacco field owned by the Coles family, and the General Assembly has commissioned a study from an arm of the National Academy of Sciences that will suggest generic guidelines for uranium mining in the commonwealth. This study will almost certainly be touted as an affirmative finding-- HEAT OF ARGUMENT
Date published: 1/31/2010
Just require the company to be responsible for all damages
that result and post a bond, the value of which is decided
by an independent assessment by risk
management/actuarialists.
Most of the time - the folks who want to build these types of
projects are looking for the govt to waiver potential
damages and/or essentially insure and make whole
damages.
Mines like this - in an area with an water table near the
surface and annual rainfall averaging 40 inches a year is a
clear risk. usually more arid areas
|
|
|||||||||||||