All News & Blogs
Date published: 9/19/2012
Growth in Stafford County's Hartwood District must still pay for its impact on transportation.
Meanwhile, county supervisors removed transportation impact fees in another district while also continuing a years-long debate on imposing a countywide fee.
Tuesday night, the Board of Supervisors voted 5-2 to repeal transportation impact fees in the George Washington District. These were put into place in 2005 to, ideally, have growth pay for itself.
But Supervisor Bob Thomas said the fees have actually hindered economic development.
"We'd really like to have more options for shopping and eating in Stafford," Thomas said. He referenced one project under review by the Planning Commission that would have been hurt by a high commercial impact fee.
He also hoped funds from a countywide fee would go toward improving artery roads, rather than little-used streets.
Supervisors Ty Schieber and Cord Sterling voted against the repeal.
"Our roads are dangerous. They're congested. They're continuing to get congested. We don't have the funding to fix all of them," said Sterling.
Meanwhile, the board maintained fees approved in 2003 in Hartwood, in the western part of the county, which has few commercial zonings.
Supervisor Gary Snellings said the fee has been helping with road improvements in his rural district, notably the Poplar Road project.
Earlier in the afternoon, the board sent a countywide fee proposal to its infrastructure committee after a staff memo detailed the potential loss of millions of dollars.
Under the new plan, developers would be required to pay $5,465 per single-family home in new subdivisions, with lower amounts for town houses and apartments.
Funds would go toward the estimated $204 million cost of upgrading 20 roads in Stafford. But committee members must decide what types of lots could be exempted from the fees.
Exempting approved preliminary plans and construction plans would mean a loss of about $36.3 million in revenue. Much of the county's current growth is happening on lots that are already approved.
Staff recommends exempting only approved subdivision construction plans, which are further along in the development process, and there are fewer of them.
Comments during the public hearing to repeal the fees in two districts were mixed.