Return to story

Benghazi: Truth vs. lies

December 17, 2012 12:10 am

Benghazi: Truth vs. lies

Let me clear up Joe Nordsieck's confusion on U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice's statements on Benghazi ["Don't be hypocritical re: Benghazi," Dec. 3]. Truth makes a difference. Ambassador Rice lied repeatedly to the American public on this issue.

The Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines a lie as: 1) "To make an untrue statement with intent to deceive"; 2) "To create a false or misleading impression." This describes exactly what Ambassador Rice did. Lies can have severe consequences. A liar cannot be trusted.

Can one lie justify or excuse another? This appears to be the gist of Nordsieck's letter. Colin Powell's lies regarding Iraq--if he did lie--do not justify Ambassador Rice's lies on Benghazi.

Are John McCain and Lindsey Graham hypocrites because they told the truth about Ambassador Rice? I think not. The hypocrite is one who justifies lies as if they were truths. This is common practice by President Obama and the Democratic Party.

Larry Buchanan

Locust Grove





Copyright 2014 The Free Lance-Star Publishing Company.